I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(Case T-225/23)
(2023/C 216/71)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: Debonair Trading Internacional Lda (Funchal, Portugal) (represented by: J. Quirin and J.-P. Jacquey, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Lea Nature Services (Périgny, France)
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark LEA NATURE SO’BIO ETIC — Application for registration No 17 592 486
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 10 February 2023 in Case R 206/2022-5
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—annul all cost orders made against the applicant by EUIPO and to order the latter to bear the costs of the applicant.
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.