I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Joined Cases C-448/10 P to C-450/10 P)
(Appeal - Compensation for expropriation on grounds of public interest - Temporal extension of a preferential tariff for the supply of electricity - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the common market and ordering its recovery - Concept of advantage - Principle of the protection of legitimate expectations - Interpretation of national law - Distortion - Concept - Appeal manifestly inadmissible and manifestly unfounded)
2012/C 32/21
Language of the case: Italian
Appellants: ThyssenKrupp Acciai Speciali Terni SpA (C-448/10 P), Cementir Italia Srl (C-449/10 P), Nuova Terni Industrie Chimiche SpA (C-450/10 P) (represented by: T. Salonico. G. Barone and A. Marega, avvocati)
Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: D. Grespan and G. Conte, acting as Agents.)
Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 1 July 2010 in Case T-62/08 ThyssenKrupp Acciai Speciali Terni v Commission, by which that Court dismissed an application for annulment of Commission Decision 2008/408/EC of 20 November 2007 on the State aid C 36/A/06 (ex NN 38/06) implemented by Italy in favour of ThyssenKrupp, Cementir and Nuova Terni Industrie Chimiche (OJ 2008 L 144, p. 37)
1.The appeals are dismissed.
2.ThyssenKrupp Acciai Speciali Terni SpA, Cementir Italia Srl and Nuova Terni Industrie Chimiche SpA are ordered to pay the costs.
*1 OJ C 317, 20.11.2010.
Language of the case: Italian