- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-91/23 P: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 27 March 2025 – XH v Commission (Appeal – Civil service – Official – Refusal to amend the official’s personal file – Decision not to include the official’s name on the list of persons promoted in 2020 – Action for annulment and for damages – Time limits for bringing proceedings – Starting point – Application for legal aid – Suspension of time limits – Article 148(9) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court – Order of the General Court refusing the applicant that aid – Service by registered post, with a form for acknowledgement of receipt, to the address mentioned in the application for legal aid – Unforeseeable circumstances or force majeure – Excusable error)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023CA0091
62023CA0091
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2025/2822
(Case C-91/23 P)
(Appeal - Civil service - Official - Refusal to amend the official’s personal file - Decision not to include the official’s name on the list of persons promoted in 2020 - Action for annulment and for damages - Time limits for bringing proceedings - Starting point - Application for legal aid - Suspension of time limits - Article 148(9) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court - Order of the General Court refusing the applicant that aid - Service by registered post, with a form for acknowledgement of receipt, to the address mentioned in the application for legal aid - Unforeseeable circumstances or force majeure - Excusable error)
(C/2025/2822)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Appellant: XH (represented by: K. Górny, adwokat)
Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: M. Brauhoff and L. Vernier, acting as Agents)
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the appeal;
2.Orders XH to pay the costs.
—
(1) OJ C 271, 31.7.2023.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2822/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—