- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-519/15 P: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 14 September 2016 — Trafilerie Meridionali SpA v European Commission (Appeal — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European prestressing steel market — Fines — Setting of the fines — 2006 Guidelines for the setting of fines — Point 35 — Unlimited jurisdiction — Obligation to state reasons — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 47 — Right to an effective remedy within a reasonable time)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62015CA0519
62015CA0519
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 419/24
(Case C-519/15 P) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
((Appeal - Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - European prestressing steel market - Fines - Setting of the fines - 2006 Guidelines for the setting of fines - Point 35 - Unlimited jurisdiction - Obligation to state reasons - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Article 47 - Right to an effective remedy within a reasonable time))
(2016/C 419/31)
Language of the case: Italian
Parties
Appellant: Trafilerie Meridionali SpA (represented by: P. M. Ferrari and G. Lamicela, avvocati)
Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: V. Bottka, G. Conte and P. Rossi, acting as Agents)
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the appeal;
2.Orders Trafilerie Meridionali SpA to pay the costs.
(<span class="note">1</span>) OJ C 406, 7.12.2015.