EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-349/09: Order of the General Court of 6 July 2010 — PAGO International v OHIM — Tirol Milch (Pago) (Community trade mark — Proceedings for revocation — Revocation of the decision of the Board of Appeal — Disappearance of the subject-matter of the proceedings — No need to adjudicate)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62009TB0349

62009TB0349

July 6, 2010
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

28.8.2010

Official Journal of the European Union

C 234/37

(Case T-349/09)(1)

(Community trade mark - Proceedings for revocation - Revocation of the decision of the Board of Appeal - Disappearance of the subject-matter of the proceedings - No need to adjudicate)

2010/C 234/66

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: PAGO International GmbH (Klagenfurt, Austria) (represented by: C. Hauer and C. Schumacher, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Tirol Milch reg. Gen. mbH Innsbruck (Innsbruck, Austria)

Re:

Action for annulment brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 1 July 2009 (Case R 864/2008-4) concerning revocation proceedings between Tirol Milch reg. Gen. mbH Innsbruck and PAGPO International GmbH

Operative part of the order

1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2.The Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 267, 7.11.2009.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia