I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
(C/2025/4315)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: Puma SE (Herzogenaurach, Germany) (represented by: M. Schunke and P. Trieb, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Sir Safety System SpA (Assisi, Italy)
Proprietor of the design at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Design at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of design No DM/214 918 (Representation of footwear sole)
Proceedings before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 26 March 2025 in Case R 1137/2024-3
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision and declare the design at issue as invalid;
—order the EUIPO to pay the costs, including those incurred before the Board of Appeal.
—Infringement of Article 25(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4315/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—