I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Series C
(Case C-173/22 P) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Appeal - Civil service - Staff of the European Investment Bank (EIB) - EIB Staff Rules - Remuneration - Family allowances - Payment to the sole parent with full custody of the child - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Article 41(2) - Right to be heard - Plea of illegality in respect of the Staff Rules - Principle of equal treatment - Principle of proportionality - Action for annulment and for damages)
(C/2024/697)
Language of the case: French
Appellant: MG (represented by: L. Levi, avocate)
Other party to the proceedings: European Investment Bank (EIB) (represented by: K. Carr, G. Faedo and E. Manoukian, acting as Agents, and by A. Dal Ferro, avvocato)
The Court:
1.Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 21 December 2021, MG v EIB (T 573/20, EU:T:2021:915);
2.Annuls the decisions of the European Investment Bank (EIB), of which the appellant was informed by the letters of 11 October 2018, 7 January 2019 and 30 July 2020;
3.Dismisses the action as to the remainder;
4.Orders the European Investment Bank (EIB) to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by MG in the proceedings at first instance and the appeal proceeding.
*
Language of the case: French.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/697/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)