I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
C series
—
10.2.2025
(C/2025/743)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Applicant: +pharma arzneimittel GmbH (Graz, Austria) (represented by: L. Wiltschek and D. Plasser, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: PlusQuam Pharma, SL (Badajoz, Spain)
Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: Application for EU word mark PlusQuam +PHARMA – Application No 18 730 938
Proceedings before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 7 November 2024 in Case R 1217/2024-2
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—amend the contested decision so that the opposition filed against EU trade mark application No 18 730 938 ‘PlusQuam +PHARMA’ is upheld in its entirety; in the alternative, annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings before the Court and before the Board of Appeal;
—order the intervener to pay the costs incurred in the proceedings before the Opposition Division.
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/743/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—