I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-440/20) (1)
(Dumping - Imports of tubes and pipes of ductile cast iron originating in India - Compliance with the judgment of the General Court in Case T-301/16 - Reimposition of a definitive anti-dumping duty - Non-repayment in full of the initial definitive anti-dumping duty - Legal basis - Non-retroactivity - Legal certainty - Article 266 TFEU - Proportionality - Right to effective judicial protection - Article 103 of the Union Customs Code - Registration Regulation - Plea of illegality - Admissibility)
(2022/C 294/34)
Language of the case: English
Applicants: Jindal Saw Ltd (New Delhi, India), Jindal Saw Italia SpA (Trieste, Italy) (represented by: R. Antonini, E. Monard and B. Maniatis, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: K. Blanck and G. Luengo, acting as Agents)
By their action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicants seek the partial annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/527 of 15 April 2020 re-imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of tubes and pipes of ductile cast iron (also known as spheroidal graphite cast iron) originating in India as regards Jindal Saw Limited following the judgment of the General Court in Case T-301/16 (OJ 2020 L 118, p. 14).
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Jindal Saw Ltd and Jindal Saw Italia SpA to pay the costs.
(1) OJ C 297, 7.9.2020.