- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-539/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht München I (Germany) lodged on 15 July 2019 — Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbände — Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband e.V. v Telefonica Germany GmbH & Co. OHG
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019CN0539
62019CN0539
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
30.9.2019
Official Journal of the European Union
C 328/27
(Case C-539/19)
(2019/C 328/30)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbände — Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband e.V.
Defendant: Telefonica Germany GmbH & Co. OHG
Question referred
Are Articles 6a and 6e(3) of Regulation (EU) No 531/2012 (1) to be interpreted as meaning that, as from 15 June 2017, mobile communications operators were required automatically to switch all customers to the regulated tariff under Article 6a of Regulation (EU) No 531/2012 regardless of whether those customers hitherto had a regulated tariff or a special, so-called alternative, roaming tariff?
* Language of the case: English.
Regulation (EU) No 531/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2012 on roaming on public mobile communications networks within the Union (OJ 2012 L 172, p. 10), as amended by Regulation (EU) 2015/2120 (OJ 2015 L 310, p. 1).
* * *
(1) Language of the case: German.