I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
—
(State aid - Polish air transport market - Aid granted by Poland to LOT in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic - Subsidised loan and capital injection - Decision not to raise any objections - Article 107(3)(b) TFEU - Temporary Framework for State aid measures - Principle of non-discrimination - Freedom to provide services - Freedom of establishment - Obligation to state reasons)
(C/2025/2852)
Language of the case: English
Applicants: Ryanair DAC (Swords, Ireland), Ryanair Sun S.A. (Warsaw, Poland) (represented by: F.-C. Laprévote, E. Vahida, S. Rating, D. Pérez de Lamo and C. Cozzani, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn, F. Tomat and C. Georgieva, acting as Agents)
Interveners in support of the defendant: Republic of Poland (represented by: B. Majczyna, M. Rzotkiewicz, S. Żyrek and J. Florecka, acting as Agents), Polskie Linie Lotnicze ‘LOT’ S.A. (Warsaw) (represented by: M. Krakowiak and A. Glapa, lawyers)
By their action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicants seek the annulment of Commission Decision C(2020) 9606 final of 22 December 2020 on State aid SA.59158 (2020/N) – Poland – COVID-19: Aid to LOT (OJ 2021 C 260, p. 1).
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Ryanair DAC and Ryanair Sun S.A. to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;
3.Orders the Republic of Poland and Polskie Linie Lotnicze ‘LOT’ S.A. to bear their own costs.
—
(1)
OJ C 338, 23.8.2021.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2852/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—