- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-616/12 P: Order of the Court of 12 September 2013 — Ellinika Nafpigeia AE and 2. Hoern Beteiligungs GmbH v European Commission (Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Appeal manifestly unfounded — Second paragraph of Article 263 TFEU — Time-limit for instituting proceedings)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62012CB0616
62012CB0616
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
21.12.2013
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 377/4
(Case C-616/12 P) (<span class="super">1</span>)
(Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Appeal manifestly unfounded - Second paragraph of Article 263 TFEU - Time-limit for instituting proceedings)
2013/C 377/06
Language of the case: Greek
Parties
Appellants: Ellinika Nafpigeia AE and 2. Hoern Beteiligungs GmbH (represented by: K Chrysogonos and A. Kaidatzis, lawyers)
Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: M. Konstantinidis and B. Stromsky, Agents)
Re:
Appeal brought against the order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) in Case T-466/11 Ellinika Nafpigeia AE and Hoern v Commission, in which the General Court declared an action for the annulment of Commission decision C(2010) 8274 final of 1 December 2010, accepting the undertakings offered by Greece in exchange for measures required by the Commission in its decision C(2008) 3118 final of 2 July 2008, declaring aid granted by the Greek authorities to Ellinika Nafpigeia (Hellenic Shipyards, ‘HSY’), to be incompatible with the common market, in the context of amendments to the initial investment plan relating to the restructuring of that shipyard (State aid C 16/2004 (ex NN29/2004, CP 71/2002 et CP 133/2005)).
Operative part of the order
1.The appeal is dismissed.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 55, 23.2.2013.