- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-689/19: Order of the General Court of 11 November 2021 — ZU v EEAS (Action for annulment and for damages — Civil service — Officials — Commission staff serving in the EEAS — Request for reimbursement of mission expenses — Request for assistance — Rejection — Competence of the author of the act — Delegation of powers — Pre-litigation procedure — Designation of the defendant — Partial inadmissibility — Principle of sound financial management — Misuse of powers — Action in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TB0689
62019TB0689
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
17.1.2022
Official Journal of the European Union
C 24/36
(Case T-689/19) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Action for annulment and for damages - Civil service - Officials - Commission staff serving in the EEAS - Request for reimbursement of mission expenses - Request for assistance - Rejection - Competence of the author of the act - Delegation of powers - Pre-litigation procedure - Designation of the defendant - Partial inadmissibility - Principle of sound financial management - Misuse of powers - Action in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
(2022/C 24/47)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: ZU (represented by: C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyer)
Defendant: European External Action Service (EEAS) (represented by: S. Marquardt and R. Spáč, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking, first, annulment of the decision of the EEAS of 30 November 2018 rejecting the applicant’s requests for the reimbursement of mission costs and for the assistance provided for in Article 24 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union and, in so far as necessary, annulment of the decision of the European Commission of 28 June 2019 rejecting the applicant’s complaint directed against the decision of the EEAS referred to above and, second, compensation for the harm allegedly suffered by him.
Operative part of the order
1.The action is dismissed.
2.ZU shall pay the costs.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 423, 16.12.2019.
Language of the case: English
ECLI:EU:C:2022:140