- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-432/22, PT (Agreement concluded between the prosecutor and the perpetrator of an offence): Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 28 November 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad – Bulgaria) – Criminal proceedings against PT (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Criminal offences and penalties in the field of illicit drug trafficking and the fight against organised crime – Possibility to reduce applicable penalties – Scope – Framework Decision 2004/757/JHA – Articles 4 and 5 – Framework Decision 2008/841/JHA – Articles 3 and 4 – National legislation not implementing EU law – Article 51(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Effective judicial protection – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Criminal proceedings against several persons – Agreement for settlement of the case provided for in national law – Approval by an ad hoc court – Consent of the other defendants)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022CA0432
62022CA0432
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2025/362
27.1.2025
(Case C-432/22, (1) PT (Agreement concluded between the prosecutor and the perpetrator of an offence))
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Area of freedom, security and justice - Judicial cooperation in criminal matters - Criminal offences and penalties in the field of illicit drug trafficking and the fight against organised crime - Possibility to reduce applicable penalties - Scope - Framework Decision 2004/757/JHA - Articles 4 and 5 - Framework Decision 2008/841/JHA - Articles 3 and 4 - National legislation not implementing EU law - Article 51(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Effective judicial protection - Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU - Criminal proceedings against several persons - Agreement for settlement of the case provided for in national law - Approval by an ad hoc court - Consent of the other defendants)
(C/2025/362)
Language of the case: Bulgarian
Referring court
Party in the main proceedings
Intervening party: Spetsializirana prokuratura
Operative part of the judgment
1.The second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU must be interpreted as not precluding a provision of national law which confers on an ad hoc court, and not on the court responsible for the case, jurisdiction to rule on an agreement for settlement of the case entered into by a defendant and the public prosecutor during the trial stage of criminal proceedings, where other defendants are also prosecuted in the same proceedings.
2.The second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU must be interpreted as not precluding a provision of national law which, in criminal proceedings brought against several defendants on the basis that they had participated in the same organised criminal group, makes the judicial approval of an agreement for settlement of the case, entered into by one of the defendants and the public prosecutor during the trial stage of those proceedings, subject to the consent of all the other defendants.
—
(1) OJ C 408, 24.10.2022.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/362/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—