- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-89/24: Judgment of the General Court of 5 March 2025 – Kapitan Navi Elżbieta Stramek i Waldemar Karpiński v EUIPO – Homann Feinkost (Matjesfilethappen nach Kolberger Art) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark Matjesfilethappen nach Kolberger Art – Absolute grounds for invalidity – No distinctive character – Descriptive character – No distinctive character acquired through use – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024TA0089
62024TA0089
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2025/2386
28.4.2025
Judgment of the General Court of 5 March 2025 – Kapitan Navi Elżbieta Stramek i Waldemar Karpiński v EUIPO – Homann Feinkost (Matjesfilethappen nach ‘Kolberger Art’)
(Case T-89/24)
(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU word mark Matjesfilethappen nach ‘Kolberger Art’ - Absolute grounds for invalidity - No distinctive character - Descriptive character - No distinctive character acquired through use - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(C/2025/2386)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Kapitan Navi Elżbieta Stramek i Waldemar Karpiński sp.j. (Trzebiatów, Poland) (represented by: A. Brudnoch, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: R. Raponi, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Homann Feinkost GmbH (Bad Essen, Germany) (represented by: C. von Nussbaum, lawyer)
Re:
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment and the alteration of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 14 December 2023 (Case R 287/2023-5).
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Kapitan Navi Elżbieta Stramek i Waldemar Karpiński sp.j., in addition to bearing its own costs, to pay those incurred by Homann Feinkost GmbH for the purposes of the proceedings before the Court;
3.Orders the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear its own costs.
—
(1) OJ C C/2024/2331, 2.4.2024.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2386/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—