I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Series C
(Case T-592/22) (*)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark Liquid+Arcade - Earlier EU figurative mark LIQUI.DO - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(C/2024/546)
Language of the case: Polish
Applicant: Liquid Advertising, Inc. (El Segundo, California, United States) (represented by: M. Czarnecki, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Walicka, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Liqui.do, SA (Lisbon, Portugal)
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment and alteration of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 28 June 2022 (Case R 2231/2021-2).
The Court:
1.Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 28 June 2022 (Case R 2231/2021-2);
2.Dismisses the action as to the remainder;
3.Orders EUIPO to pay the costs.
(*) Language of the case: Polish.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/546/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
* * *