- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case F-113/13: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 15 October 2015 — DI v EASO (Civil Service — EASO staff — Contractual staff — Probationary period — Dismissed as manifestly unsuitable — Action for annulment — Lack of concordance between the application and the claim — Manifest inadmissibility — Action for damages)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62013FB0113
62013FB0113
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
23.11.2015
Official Journal of the European Union
C 389/66
(Case F-113/13)
((Civil Service - EASO staff - Contractual staff - Probationary period - Dismissed as manifestly unsuitable - Action for annulment - Lack of concordance between the application and the claim - Manifest inadmissibility - Action for damages))
(2015/C 389/75)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: DI (represented by: I. Vlaic, lawyer)
Defendant: European Asylum Support Office (EASO) (represented by: L. Cerdán Ortiz-Quintana, acting as Agent, and D. Waelbroeck and A. Duron, lawyers)
Re:
Application for annulment of the decision of the European Asylum Support Office (EASO) to terminate the applicant’s employment contract after the probationary period, which was extended by three months.
Operative part of the order
1.The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.
2.DI shall bear his own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Asylum Support Office.