- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-77/09: Judgment of the General Court of 9 March 2010 — hofherr communikation GmbH v OHIM (NATURE WATCH) (Community trade mark — International registration designating the European Community — Word mark NATURE WATCH — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62009TA0077
62009TA0077
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 113/44
Judgment of the General Court of 9 March 2010 — hofherr kommunikation GmbH v OHIM (NATURE WATCH)
(Case T-77/09)(<span class="super">1</span>)
(Community trade mark - International registration designating the European Community - Word mark NATURE WATCH - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
2010/C 113/71
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: hofherr kommunikation GmbH (Innsbruck, Austria) (represented by: S. Warbek, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, Agent)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 4 December 2008 (Case R 1410/2008-1) concerning the international registration, designating the European Community, of the word sign NATURE WATCH.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action.
2.Orders hofherr kommunikation GmbH to pay the costs.
(<span class="note"> <a id="ntr1-C_2010113EN.01004402-E0001" href="#ntc1-C_2010113EN.01004402-E0001">*1</a> </span>) OJ C 90, 18.4.2009.