- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-68/21: Judgment of the General Court of 27 April 2022 — QA v Commission (Non-contractual liability — Grant agreement concluded in the context of the Seventh framework programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007 to 2013) — Audit report — Language — Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals — Proportionality — Principle of good administration)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TA0068
62021TA0068
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 237/49
(Case T-68/21) (1)
(Non-contractual liability - Grant agreement concluded in the context of the Seventh framework programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007 to 2013) - Audit report - Language - Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals - Proportionality - Principle of good administration)
(2022/C 237/61)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: QA (represented by: C. Roth, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Perrin and E. Stamate, acting as Agents)
Re:
By her action based on Article 268 TFEU, the applicant seeks compensation for the material and non-material damage which she claims to have suffered as a result of certain comments in the final audit report of 8 January 2014 adopted by the European Commission following the financial audit carried out regarding A’s participation in project B which was funded in the context of the Seventh framework programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007 to 2013).
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders QA to pay the costs.
(1) OJ C 138, 19.4.2021.