I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(2023/C 104/60)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: Roche Diagnostics GmbH (Mannheim, Germany) (represented by: M. Douglas, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: SAS Di’X (Avignon, France)
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the mark AVENIO — International registration designating the European Union No 1 313 134
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 31 October 2022 in Case R 1291/2018-1
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
—Infringement of Article 95(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Incorrect assessment of the likelihood of confusion.