I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2022/C 2/67)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Applicant: Allessa GmbH (Frankfurt am Main, Germany) (represented by: S. Fröhlich, M. Hartmann and H. Lerchl, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Carim Dumerth (Frankfurt am Main)
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: EU word mark CASSELLAPARK — EU word mark No 16 917 429
Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 11 August 2021 in Case R 1043/2020-5
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings and the costs incurred by the applicant.
—Infringement of the right to be heard consisting in an adequate statement of reasons;
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 59(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.