EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-558/23, Dramanova: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rayonen sad Lukovit (Bulgaria) lodged on 6 September 2023 — Criminal proceedings against IC

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023CN0558

62023CN0558

September 6, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

Series C

C/2023/644

13.11.2023

(Case C-558/23, Dramanova (1))

(C/2023/644)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Rayonna prokuratura Lovech, Teritorialno otdelenie grad Lukovit, Bulgaria

Questions referred

1.Does the principle of proportionality permit a national legal provision, such as Article 172b of the Nakazatelen kodeks (Criminal Code), which provides for a custodial sentence of one to six years and a fine for a first infringement of intellectual property rights, irrespective of whether the unlawful use of a protected trade mark is wilful and/or on a commercial scale?

2.If the first question is answered in the negative, how are the expressions ‘wilful’ and ‘on a commercial scale’, used in Article 61 of the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (the TRIPS Agreement), to be interpreted?

3.Do the principles of legality and the prohibition of the arbitrary application of the law permit national legislation which simultaneously provides for liability under both administrative law (Article 127 of the Zakon za markite i geografskite oznachenia (Law on trade marks and geographical designations)) and criminal law (Article 172b of the Criminal Code), without laying down clear criteria allowing the degree of danger to the general public posed by one and the same act (unlawful use of protected trade marks) to be objectively and predictably assessed?

The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/644/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia