I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
16.12.2024
(Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered Community design representing floor markings - Articles 3(a) and 25(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 - Unicity of the design - Consistency of views)
(C/2024/7330)
Language of the case: German
Applicant: Orgatex GmbH & Co. KG (Langenfeld, Germany) (represented by: G. Jacobs, M. Maybaum and M. Dümenil, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Markakis, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Lawrence Longton (Brindle, United Kingdom) (represented by: A. Haberl, lawyer)
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 17 November 2022 (Case R 110/2022-3).
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Orgatex GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs.
—
Language of the case: German.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/7330/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—
* * *