- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-188/21: Judgment of the General Court of 15 December 2021 — Lück v EUIPO — R. H. Investment (MALLE) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark MALLE — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptive character — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Ineffective nature of the single plea in law)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TA0188
62021TA0188
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 84/40
(Case T-188/21) (*)
(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU word mark MALLE - Absolute grounds for refusal - Descriptive character - No distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation 2017/1001 - Ineffective nature of the single plea in law)
(2022/C 84/56)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Jörg Lück (Hilden, Germany) (represented by: L. Becker, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Eberl and E. Markakis, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: R. H. Investment UG (haftungsbeschränkt) (Erlangen, Germany) (represented by: M. Metzner and M. Scheiner, lawyers)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 December 2020 (Case R 1393/2020-5), relating to invalidity proceedings between R. H. Investment and Mr Lück.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Jörg Lück to pay the costs.
(*) Language of the case: German.
(1) OJ C 217, 7.6.2021.