I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-543/13)(1)
((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark PRANAYUR - Earlier Community word mark AYUR and earlier Community figurative marks Ayur, Ayur Naturals Herbals and Aanb - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
(2015/C 127/33)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Three-N-Products Private Ltd (New Delhi, India) (represented by: N. Colombo, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: V. Melgar, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Munindra Holding BV (Lelystad, Netherlands)
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 25 July 2013 (Case R 638/2012-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Three-N-Products Private Ltd and Munindra Holding BV.
The Court:
1)Dismisses the action;
2)Orders Three-N-Products Private Ltd to pay the costs.
OJ C 367, 14.12.2013.