I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2020/C 271/55)
Language in which the application was lodged: Italian
Applicant: Tubes Radiatori Srl (Resana, Italy) (represented by: S. Verea, K. Muraro, M. Balestriero and P. Menapace, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Antrax It Srl (Resana, Italy)
Proprietor of the design at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Design at issue: Community design No 169 370 - 0002 (Radiator for heating)
Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 March 2020 in Case R 1275/2017-3
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—find and declare that Community design No 169 370 - 0002, owned by TUBES RADIATORI Srl, is valid in so far as it is new and has individual character;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
—Infringement of Article 6 of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.