- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-133/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Εfeteio Athinon (Greece) lodged on 3 March 2021 — VP, CX, RG, TR and Others v Elliniko Dimosio
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021CN0133
62021CN0133
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
31.5.2021
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 206/14
(Case C-133/21)
(2021/C 206/18)
Language of the case: Greek
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Appellants: VP, CX, RG, TR and Others
Respondent: Elliniko Dimosio
Questions referred
Is national legislation, such as that at issue, which imposes different treatment for wage purposes on workers with fixed-term contracts within the meaning of clause 1 of Directive 1999/70/EC
Council Directive 1999/70/EC of 28 June 1999 concerning the framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP. (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
In particular, is national legislation under which different treatment of workers for wage purposes is justified on the ground that they provided their work under fixed-term contracts in the knowledge that they were covering fixed and permanent needs of the employer compatible with clause 4 of Directive 1999/70/EC?
as compared to the comparable permanent worker, on the basis of the sole criterion of differentiation that their contracts are classified by their employer or by law as fixed-term contracts for work, compatible with clause 4 of Directive 1999/70/EC?
* * *
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) Language of the case: Greek.