- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Joined Cases C-8/15 P to C-10/15 P: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 20 September 2016 — Ledra Advertising Ltd (C-8/15 P), Andreas Eleftheriou (C-9/15 P), Eleni Eleftheriou (C-9/15 P), Lilia Papachristofi (C-9/15 P), Christos Theophilou (C-10/15 P), Eleni Theophilou (C-10/15 P) v European Commission, European Central Bank (Appeals — Stability support programme for the Republic of Cyprus — Memorandum of Understanding of 26 April 2013 on Specific Economic Policy Conditionality concluded between the Republic of Cyprus and the European Stability Mechanism (ESM) — Duties of the European Commission and the European Central Bank — Non-contractual liability of the European Union — Second paragraph of Article 340 TFEU — Conditions — Obligation to ensure that the Memorandum of Understanding is consistent with EU law)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62015CA0008
62015CA0008
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
14.11.2016
Official Journal of the European Union
C 419/10
(Joined Cases C-8/15 P to C-10/15 P) (<a id="ntc1-C_2016419EN.01001001-E0001" href="#ntr1-C_2016419EN.01001001-E0001"> (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)</a>)
((Appeals - Stability support programme for the Republic of Cyprus - Memorandum of Understanding of 26 April 2013 on Specific Economic Policy Conditionality concluded between the Republic of Cyprus and the European Stability Mechanism (ESM) - Duties of the European Commission and the European Central Bank - Non-contractual liability of the European Union - Second paragraph of Article 340 TFEU - Conditions - Obligation to ensure that the Memorandum of Understanding is consistent with EU law))
(2016/C 419/12)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Appellants: Ledra Advertising Ltd (C-8/15 P), Andreas Eleftheriou (C-9/15 P), Eleni Eleftheriou (C-9/15 P), Lilia Papachristofi (C-9/15 P), Christos Theophilou (C-10/15 P), Eleni Theophilou (C-10/15 P) (represented by: A. Paschalides, dikigoros, A. Paschalidou, Barrister, and A. Riza QC, instructed by C. Paschalides, Solicitor)
Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: J.-P. Keppenne and M. Konstantinidis, acting as Agents), European Central Bank (represented by: K. Laurinavičius and O. Heinz, acting as Agents, and H.-G. Kamann, Rechtsanwalt)
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Sets aside the orders of the General Court of the European Union of 10 November 2014, Ledra Advertising v Commission and ECB (T-289/13, EU:T:2014:981), of 10 November 2014, Eleftheriou and Papachristofi v Commission and ECB (T-291/13, not published, EU:T:2014:978), and of 10 November 2014, Theophilou v Commission and ECB (T-293/13, not published, EU:T:2014:979);
2.Dismisses the actions brought before the General Court in Cases T-289/13, T-291/13 and T-293/13;
3.Orders Ledra Advertising Ltd, Andreas Eleftheriou, Eleni Eleftheriou, Lilia Papachristofi, Christos Theophilou, Eleni Theophilou, the European Commission and the European Central Bank (ECB) each to bear their own costs incurred both at first instance and on appeal.
(<a id="ntr1-C_2016419EN.01001001-E0001" href="#ntc1-C_2016419EN.01001001-E0001">(<span class="super">1</span>)</a> OJ C 171, 26.5.2015).