- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-817/19: Action brought on 27 November 2019 – Olimp Laboratories v EUIPO – OmniVision (Hydrovision)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TN0817
62019TN0817
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 27/68
—
(Case T-817/19)
(2020/C 27/68)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Olimp Laboratories sp. z o.o. (Dębica, Poland) (represented by: M. Kondrat, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: OmniVision GmbH (Puchheim, Germany)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark Hydrovision – Application for registration No 16 286 841
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 13 September 2019 in Case R 2371/2018-2
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision and refer the case back to the EUIPO for reconsideration; or
—alter the contested decision;
—award the costs in the Applicant’s favor.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of the principle of the protection of legitimate expectations and the principle of legal certainty.
—