I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Series C
(Cases T-858/16 and T-867/16) (*)
(State aid - Aid scheme put into effect by Belgium - Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market and unlawful and ordering recovery of the aid granted - Tax ruling - Taxable profit - Excess profit exemption - Advantage - Selectivity - Recovery)
(C/2023/763)
Language of the case: English
Applicants in Case T-858/16: Dow Silicones Corp., formerly Dow Corning Corp. (Midland, Michigan, United States), Dow Silicones Belgium, formerly Dow Corning Europe (Seneffe, Belgium)
Applicant in Case T-867/16: Vinventions, formerly Nomacorc (Thimister-Clermont, Belgium)
(represented by H. Gilliams and L. Goossens, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P.-J. Loewenthal, B. Stromsky and F. Tomat, acting as Agents)
By their actions under Article 263 TFEU, the applicants seek the annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2016/1699 of 11 January 2016 on the excess profit exemption State aid scheme SA.37667 (2015/C) (ex 2015/NN) implemented by Belgium (OJ 2016 L 260, p. 61).
The Court:
1.Orders that Cases T-858/16 and T-867/16 be joined for the purposes of the present judgment;
2.Dismisses the actions;
3.Orders Dow Silicones Corp. and Dow Silicones Belgium to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission in Case T-858/16;
4.Orders Vinventions to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Commission in Case T-867/16.
*
(*) Language of the case: English.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/763/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)