- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-518/14: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Niedersächsisches Finanzgericht (Germany) lodged on 18 November 2014 — Senatex GmbH v Finanzamt Hannover-Nord
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014CN0518
62014CN0518
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 34/12
(Case C-518/14)
(2015/C 034/12)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Senatex GmbH
Defendant: Finanzamt Hannover-Nord
Questions referred
1.Is the ex nunc effect of the first issue of an invoice, as established by the Court of Justice in the judgment in Case C-152/02 Terra Baubedarf-Handel v Finanzamt Osterholz-Scharmbeck qualified by the judgments of the Court of Justice in Case C-368/09 Pannon Gép Centrum v Központi Hivatal Hatósági Főosztály Dél-dunántúli Kihelyezett Hatósági Osztáy and Case C-271/12 Petroma Transports v Belgium as regards cases, such as the present, in which an incomplete invoice is completed, so that the Court of Justice ultimately intended to permit retrospective effect in such cases?
2.What are the minimum requirements for an invoice to be capable of correction with retrospective effect? Is it necessary that the original invoice bears a tax number or a VAT identification number, or can these be added later with the consequence that the right to deduction is retained on the basis of the original invoice?
3.Is a correction to an invoice in time if it is only made in the course of objection proceedings against the decision (amendment notice) of the tax authority?
ECLI:EU:C:204:268.
ECLI:EU:C:2010:441.
ECLI:EU:C:2013:297.