- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-792/21: Order of the General Court of 6 July 2022 — ClientEarth v Commission (Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Aarhus Convention — Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 — Impact assessment report and other documents relating to a legislative initiative in the environmental field — Implied refusal of access — Express decision adopted after the action was brought — No need to adjudicate)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TB0792
62021TB0792
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
5.9.2022
Official Journal of the European Union
C 340/42
(Case T-792/21) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Aarhus Convention - Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 - Impact assessment report and other documents relating to a legislative initiative in the environmental field - Implied refusal of access - Express decision adopted after the action was brought - No need to adjudicate)
(2022/C 340/59)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: ClientEarth AISBL (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: F. Logue, Solicitor)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Ehrbar and A. Spina, acting as Agents)
Re:
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the implied decision of the European Commission of 12 October 2021 rejecting the confirmatory application for access to several documents relating to the European Union’s legislative initiative regarding sustainable corporate governance.
Operative part of the order
1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.
2.The European Commission is to pay the costs.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 84, 21.2.2022.