I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2022/C 451/26)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: U. I. Lapp GmbH (Stuttgart, Germany) (represented by: R. Ingerl and M. Ringer, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Labkable Asia Ltd (Kowloon, Hong Kong, China)
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark Labkable Solutions for cables — Application for registration No 18 123 696
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 22 July 2022 in Case R 1894/2021-2
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—alter the contested decision so that the appeal filed by the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal is dismissed;
—alternatively, annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs incurred by the applicant.
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 94(1), first sentence of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.