I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-108/17) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
(REACH - Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 - Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) - Request for internal review of a decision on marketing authorisation rejected as unfounded - Error of law - Manifest error of assessment - Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006)
(2019/C 187/70)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: ClientEarth (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: A. Jones, Barrister)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Gattinara, R. Lindenthal and K. Mifsud-Bonnici, acting as Agents)
Intervener in support of the defendant: European Chemicals Agency (represented by: M. Heikkilä and W. Broere, acting as Agents)
Application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of the letter of the Commission of 7 December 2016 by which that institution rejected a request for internal review of 2 August 2016 against Commission Implementing Decision C(2016) 3549 final of 16 June 2016, granting an authorisation for uses of bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) under Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders ClientEarth to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission;
3.Orders the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) to bear its own costs.
(<span class="note"> <a id="ntr1-C_2019187EN.01006601-E0001" href="#ntc1-C_2019187EN.01006601-E0001">*1</a> </span>) OJ C 121, 18.4.2017.