- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-685/22: Action brought on 11 November 2022 — Lycatelcom v Commission
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TN0685
62022TN0685
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
23.1.2023
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 24/50
(Case T-685/22)
(2023/C 24/66)
Language of the case: Portuguese
Parties
Applicant: Lycatelcom, Lda (Zona Franca da Madeira) (Funchal, Portugal) (represented by: S. Gemas Donário and S. Soares, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the General Court should:
—annul Commission Decision C(2020) 8550 final of 4 December 2020 on aid scheme SA.21259 (2018/C) (ex 2018/NN) implemented by Portugal for Zona Franca da Madeira (ZFM) — Regime III;
—order the Commission to pay the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on five pleas in law which are essentially identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-553/22, Thorn Investments v Commission.