- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Joined Cases C-586/24 and C-605/24, Rabal and Drałka: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 3 March 2025 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy – Poland) – I.G. and D.L. (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Article 267 TFEU – Concept of court or tribunal – Judge of the Civil Chamber of the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court, Poland) – Judge appointed by the President of the Republic of Poland on the basis of a resolution of the Krajowa Rada Sądownictwa (National Council of the Judiciary, Poland) in its new composition – Reference for a preliminary ruling from a formation of the court which does not have the status of an independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law – Manifest inadmissibility)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024CB0586
62024CB0586
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2025/2504
12.5.2025
(Joined Cases C-586/24
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Article 267 TFEU - Concept of ‘court or tribunal’ - Judge of the Civil Chamber of the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court, Poland) - Judge appointed by the President of the Republic of Poland on the basis of a resolution of the Krajowa Rada Sądownictwa (National Council of the Judiciary, Poland) in its new composition - Reference for a preliminary ruling from a formation of the court which does not have the status of an independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law - Manifest inadmissibility)
(C/2025/2504)
Language of the case: Polish
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Appellants: I.G. (C-586/24), D.L. (C-605/24)
Other parties: H.G., T.P., M.G. (C-586/24), Zastępca Rzecznika Dyscyplinarnego przy Sądzie Okręgowym w P. (C-605/24)
Operative part of the order
The requests for a preliminary ruling made by the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court, Poland), sitting as a single judge, by decisions of 5 August 2024 (C-605/24) and 19 August 2024 (C-586/24), are manifestly inadmissible.
—
(1) Date lodged: 6/9/2024.
(2) Date lodged: 17/9/2024.
(3) The names of the present case are fictitious names. They do not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2504/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—