- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-225/10: Action brought on 18 May 2010 — Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria v Commission
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62010TN0225
62010TN0225
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
3.7.2010
Official Journal of the European Union
C 179/56
(Case T-225/10)
(2010/C 179/96)
Language of the case: Spanish
Parties
Applicant: Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, SA (Bilbao, Spain) (represented by: J. Buendía Sierra, E. Abad Valdenebro, M. Muñoz de Juan and R. Calvo Salinero, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
—Annulment of Article 1(1) of the contested decision in so far as it states that Article 12(5) TRLIS (Amended Law on Corporation Tax) contains elements of State aid;
—In the alternative, annulment of Article 1(1) of the contested decision in so far as it states that Article 12(5) TRLIS contains elements of State aid where it applies to share acquisitions which result in acquisition of control; and
—Order the Commission to pay the costs of the proceedings.
Pleas in law and main arguments
The decision against which the present action is brought is the same as that contested in Cases T-219/10 Autogrill España v Commission and T-221/10 Iberdrola v Commission.
The pleas and main arguments are similar to those relied on in the context of those cases.
They allege, in essence, errors of law both in the legal classification of the measure as State aid and in identifying the beneficiaries of that measure.