- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-15/16: Judgment of the General Court of 14 February 2017 — Pandalis v EUIPO — LR Health & Beauty Systems (Cystus) ((EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU word mark Cystus — Partial revocation — Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — No genuine use of the mark))
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TA0015
62016TA0015
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
27.3.2017
Official Journal of the European Union
C 95/10
(Case T-15/16) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
(((EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU word mark Cystus - Partial revocation - Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - No genuine use of the mark)))
(2017/C 095/18)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Georgios Pandalis (Glandorf, Germany) (represented by: A. Franke, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Hanne, Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: LR Health & Beauty Systems GmbH (Ahlen, Germany) (represented by: N. Weber and L. Thiel, lawyers)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 30 October 2015 (Case R 2839/2014-1), relating to revocation proceedings between LR Health & Beauty Systems and Mr Pandalis.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Mr Georgios Pandalis to pay the costs.
(<span class="note"> <a id="ntr1-C_2017095EN.01001002-E0001" href="#ntc1-C_2017095EN.01001002-E0001">*1</a> </span>) OJ C 90, 7.3.2016.