- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-65/14: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal du Travail de Nivelles (Belgium) lodged on 10 February 2014 — Charlotte Rosselle v Institut national d’assurance maladie-invalidité (INAMI), Union nationale des mutualités libres (UNM Libres)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014CN0065
62014CN0065
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
28.4.2014
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 129/13
(Case C-65/14)
(2014/C 129/16)
Language of the case: French
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Charlotte Rosselle
Defendants: Institut national d’assurance maladie-invalidité (INAMI), Union nationale des mutualités libres (UNM Libres)
Intervener: Institut pour l'Egalité des Femmes et des Hommes (IEFH)
Question referred
Do sections 1 and 2 of title III, chapter III, of the Royal Decree of 3 July 1996 implementing the Law of 14 July 1994 coordinating compulsory medical care and sickness benefit insurance infringe Council Directive 92/85/EEC of 19 October 1992 on the introduction of measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health at work of pregnant workers and workers who have recently given birth or are breastfeeding (1) and Directive 2006/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006 on the implementation of the principle of equal opportunities and equal treatment of men and women in matters of employment and occupation (recast) (2) in failing to provide for an exemption from the minimum contribution period for a public servant assigned non-active status for personal reasons who is on maternity leave, whereas such an exemption is provided for a public servant who has resigned or has been dismissed?
(1)
OJ 1992 L 348, p. 1.
(2)
OJ 2006 L 204, p. 23.