I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
C series
—
(C/2024/7039)
Language of the case: Dutch
Applicant: FL (represented by: J. Reisinger, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation (Eurojust) and European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol)
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—under Article 268 TFEU, read in conjunction with Article 340 TFEU, Article 50 of Regulation 2016/794 (1) and Article 47 of Regulation 2018/1727, (2) award compensation in the amount of EUR 15 000 – in order to assess the damage, reference is made to the compensation in Case C-755/21 P, Kočner v Europol, (3) the difference being that the damage here is even greater and more comprehensive – for the non-material damage suffered in the context of the ‘Exclu’ operation and the related acts of Eurojust and Europol;
—order the defendants to pay the costs.
In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law which are essentially identical or comparable to the pleas that have been put forward in Case T-148/24, CW v Eurojust and Europol. (4)
—
(1) Regulation (EU) 2016/794 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2016 on the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) and replacing and repealing Council Decisions 2009/371/JHA, 2009/934/JHA, 2009/935/JHA, 2009/936/JHA and 2009/968/JHA (OJ 2016 L 135, p. 53).
(2) Regulation (EU) 2018/1727 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 November 2018 on the European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation (Eurojust), and replacing and repealing Council Decision 2002/187/JHA (OJ 2018 L 295, p. 138).
(3) OJ C C/2024/202, 5.3.2024.
(4) OJ C C/2024/3175, 21.5.2024.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/7039/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—
—