I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-107/11) (<span class="super">1</span>)
(Appeal - Civil service - Temporary staff - Contract of indefinite duration - Decision to terminate - Jurisdiction of the Civil Service Tribunal - Articles 2 and 47 CEOS - Duty of care - Concept of interests of the service - Prohibition on ruling ultra petita - Rights of the defence)
2014/C 24/31
Language of the case: French
Appellant: European Training Foundation (ETF) (represented by: L. Levi, lawyer)
Other party to the proceedings: Gisela Schuerings (represented by: N. Lhoëst, lawyer)
Interveners in support of the appellant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and D. Martin, acting as Agents); European Medicines Agency (EMA) (represented: initially by V. Salvatore, and subsequently by T. Jabłoński, acting as Agents); European Environment Agency (EEA) (represented by: O. Cornu, acting as Agent); European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) (represented by: P. Goudou, acting as Agent); European Union Agency for Network and Information Security (ENISA) (represented by: E. Maurage, acting as Agent); Translation Centre for the Bodies of the European Union (CdT) (represented by: J. Rikkert and M. Garnier, acting as Agents); European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) (represented by: M. Heikkilä, acting as Agent); and European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) (represented by: D. Detken, acting as Agent)
Appeal against the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 9 December 2010 in Case F-87/08 Schuerings v ETF, not yet published in the ECR, and seeking that that judgment be set aside.
The Court:
1.Sets aside the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 9 December 2010 in Case F-87/08 Schuerings v ETF, in so far as it set aside the decision of the European Training Foundation (ETF) of 23 October 2007 terminating the indefinite contract of Ms Gisela Schuerings and dismissing, as a result, her application for compensation for the material harm suffered as being premature;
2.Dismisses the remainder of the appeal;
3.Refers the case back to the Civil Service Tribunal;
4.Reserves the costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 139, 7.5.2011.