I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-585/21) (*)
(State aid - Compensation granted for the provision of the universal service obligation in the postal sector - Complaint - Action for annulment - Act not open to challenge - Inadmissibility)
(2022/C 284/50)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Zásilkovna s. r. o. (Prague, Czech Republic) (represented by: R. Kubáč, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Carpi Badía and L. Nicolae, acting as Agents)
Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment, first, of the Commission’s letter of 9 July 2021 concerning the compensation granted to Česká pošta for the provision of a universal service obligation for the period from 2018 to 2022 and the decision of 23 June 2020 initiating the formal investigation procedure (SA.55208 (2020/C), SA.55497 (2019/FC) and SA.55686 (2019/FC)) and, second, of the Commission’s letter of 31 August 2021 concerning the compensation granted to Česká pošta for the provision of a universal service obligation for the period from 2018 to 2022 (SA.55208 (2020/C)).
1.The action is dismissed as inadmissible.
2.There is no need to rule on the applications to intervene of the Czech Republic and Česká pošta.
3.Zásilkovna s. r. o. shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission, with the exception of those relating to the applications to intervene.
4.Zásilkovna, the Czech Republic and Česká pošta shall each bear their own costs relating to the applications to intervene.
(*) Language of the case: English.
ECLI:EU:C:2022:140
Language of the case: English