- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-357/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Salzburg (Austria) lodged on 31 May 2018 — Bettina Plackner v Nürnberger Versicherung Aktiengesellschaft Österreich
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018CN0357
62018CN0357
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case C-357/18)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Bettina Plackner
Defendant: Nürnberger Versicherung Aktiengesellschaft Österreich
Question referred
Must Article 15(1) of Directive 90/619/EEC (Second Life Assurance Directive), as amended by Directive 92/96/EEC (Third Life Assurance Directive), in conjunction with Article 31 of Directive 92/96/EEC, be interpreted as meaning that information regarding the right of cancellation must also contain the notice that the cancellation does not have to be communicated in any specific form?
*
Second Council Directive 90/619/EEC of 8 November 1990 on the coordination of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to direct life assurance, laying down provisions to facilitate the effective exercise of freedom to provide services and amending Directive 79/267/EEC (OJ 1990 L 330, p. 50).
Council Directive 92/96/EEC of 10 November 1992 on the coordination of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to direct life assurance and amending Directives 79/267/EEC and 90/619/EEC (third life assurance Directive) (OJ 1992 L 360, p. 1).