- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-368/11: Judgment of the General Court of 1 February 2013 — Polyelectrolyte Producers Group and Others v Commission (REACH — Transitional measures concerning the restrictions on the placing on the market and use of acrylamide for grouting applications — Annex XVII to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 — Proportionality — Obligation to state reasons)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62011TA0368
62011TA0368
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
16.3.2013
Official Journal of the European Union
C 79/16
(Case T-368/11) (<span class="super">1</span>)
(REACH - Transitional measures concerning the restrictions on the placing on the market and use of acrylamide for grouting applications - Annex XVII to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 - Proportionality - Obligation to state reasons)
2013/C 79/28
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicants: Polyelectrolyte Producers Group (Brussels, Belgium); SNF SAS (Andrézieux-Bouthéon, France); and Travetanche Injection SPRL (Brussels) (represented by: K. Van Maldegem and R. Cana, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Oliver and E. Manhaeve, Agents, assisted by K. Sawyer, Barrister)
Intervener in support of the defendant: Kingdom of the Netherlands (represented by: C. Wissels, M. Noort and B. Koopman, Agents)
Re:
Application for annulment of Commission Regulation (EU) No 366/2011 of 14 April 2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) as regards Annex XVII (Acrylamide) (OJ 2011 L 101, p. 12).
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Polyelectrolyte Producers Group, SNF SAS and Travetanche Injection SPRL to bear the costs they have incurred in the main proceedings and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;
3.Orders Travetanche Injection to pay the costs relating to the proceedings for interim measures;
4.Orders the Kingdom of the Netherlands to bear its own costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 282, 24.9.2011.