- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-299/20: Judgment of the General Court of 30 March 2022 — KF v EIB (Civil service — EIB staff — Complaint of psychological harassment — Administrative investigation — Decision rejecting the complaint — Error of assessment — Principle of sound administration — Liability)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TA0299
62020TA0299
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
23.5.2022
Official Journal of the European Union
C 207/36
(Case T-299/20)
(Civil service - EIB staff - Complaint of psychological harassment - Administrative investigation - Decision rejecting the complaint - Error of assessment - Principle of sound administration - Liability)
(2022/C 207/46)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: KF (represented by: L. Levi and A. Blot, lawyers)
Defendant: European Investment Bank (represented by: K. Carr and J. Pawlowicz, acting as Agents, and by J. Currall and B. Wägenbaur, lawyers)
Re:
Application under Article 270 TFEU and Article 50a of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union seeking, first, annulment of the EIB’s decision of 27 January 2020 rejecting the applicant’s complaint of harassment and, secondly, compensation for the material and non-material damage which she claims to have suffered as a result of that decision.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Annuls the decision of the President of the European Investment Bank (EIB) of 27 January 2020;
2.Orders the EIB to pay KF the amount of EUR 3 000;
3.Dismisses the action as to the remainder;
4.Orders the EIB to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by KF.
(1) OJ C 262, 10.8.2020.