EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-603/19 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 13 March 2020 — Helsingin Bussiliikenne v Commission (Application for interim measures — State aid — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery — Application for suspension of operation of a measure — No urgency)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TB0603

62019TB0603

March 13, 2020
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

25.5.2020

Official Journal of the European Union

C 175/27

(Case T-603/19 R)

(Application for interim measures - State aid - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - No urgency)

(2020/C 175/36)

Language of the case: Finnish

Parties

Applicant: Helsingin Bussiliikenne Oy (Helsinki, Finland) (represented by O. Hyvönen and N. Rosenlund, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by M. Huttunen and F. Tomat, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant: the Republic of Finland (represented by J. Heliskoski, acting as Agent)

Re:

Application under Articles 278 and 279 TFUE seeking suspension of operation of Commission Decision C(2019) 3152 final of 28 June 2019 on the State aid SA.33846 (2015/C) (ex 2014/NN) (ex 2011/CP) implemented by the Republic of Finland for the applicant.

Operative part of the order

1.The application for interim measures is rejected;

2.There is no need to adjudicate on the application to intervene by Nobina Oy and Nobina AB and on the request for confidential treatment by the European Commission;

3.The costs are reserved, with the exception of those incurred by Nobina Oy and Nobina AB, which shall bear their own costs relating to their application to intervene in the proceedings for interim measures.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia