EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-253/23, ASG 2: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 28 January 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Dortmund – Germany) – ASG 2 Ausgleichsgesellschaft für die Sägeindustrie Nordrhein-Westfalen GmbH v Land Nordrhein-Westfalen (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Article 101 TFEU – Directive 2014/104/EU – Actions for damages for infringements of competition law – Point 4 of Article 2– Concept of action for damages – Article 3(1) – Right to full compensation for harm suffered – Assignment of compensation claims to a provider of legal services – National law precluding recognition of the standing of such a provider with a view to group collection of those claims – Article 4 – Principle of effectiveness – First paragraph of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to effective judicial protection)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023CA0253

62023CA0253

January 28, 2025
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C series

C/2025/1619

24.3.2025

(Case C-253/23,

ASG 2)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Competition - Article 101 TFEU - Directive 2014/104/EU - Actions for damages for infringements of competition law - Point 4 of Article 2– Concept of ‘action for damages’ - Article 3(1) - Right to full compensation for harm suffered - Assignment of compensation claims to a provider of legal services - National law precluding recognition of the standing of such a provider with a view to group collection of those claims - Article 4 - Principle of effectiveness - First paragraph of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Right to effective judicial protection)

(C/2025/1619)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: ASG 2 Ausgleichsgesellschaft für die Sägeindustrie Nordrhein-Westfalen GmbH

Defendant: Land Nordrhein-Westfalen

Other parties: Otto Fuchs Beteiligungen KG, Bundeskartellamt

Operative part of the judgment

Article 101 TFEU, read in conjunction with point 4 of Article 2, Article 3(1) and Article 4 of Directive 2014/104/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 November 2014 on certain rules governing actions for damages under national law for infringements of the competition law provisions of the Member States and of the European Union, and the first paragraph of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union,

must be interpreted as precluding an interpretation of national legislation which has the effect of preventing persons allegedly harmed by an infringement of competition law from assigning their rights to compensation to a provider of legal services so that it may assert them, collectively, in an action for damages that does not follow the decision of a competition authority finding such an infringement that is final and binding, in particular with regard to the establishment of the facts, provided that

national law does not provide for any other possibility of grouping together the individual claims of those injured persons that would ensure the effectiveness of the exercise of those rights to compensation, and

the bringing of an individual action for damages is, having regard to all the circumstances of the case, impossible or excessively difficult for those persons, with the result that they are deprived of their right to effective judicial protection.

Should it not be possible to interpret that national legislation in a way that complies with the requirements of EU law, those provisions of EU law require the national court to disapply that national legislation.

OJ C 261, 24.7.2023.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1619/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia