- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-157/18: Action brought on 28 February 2018 — Caprice Schuhproduktion v Commission
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018TN0157
62018TN0157
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
23.4.2018
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 142/69
(Case T-157/18)
(2018/C 142/88)
Language of the case: Dutch
Parties
Applicant: Caprice Schuhproduktion GmbH & Co. KG (Pirmasens, Germany) (represented by: S. De Knop, B. Natens and A. Willems, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the General Court should:
—declare the application admissible;
—annul Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/2232 of 4 December 2017 reimposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather originating in the People's Republic of China and Vietnam and produced by certain exporting producers in the People’s Republic of China and Vietnam and implementing the judgment of the Court of Justice in Joined Cases C-659/13 and C-34/14; and
—order the Commission to pay the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law. The pleas put forward are identical to those put forward in Case T-127/18, Cortina and FLA Europe v Commission.