- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-169/15: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 October 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Benelux Gerechtshof — BENELUX) — Montis Design BV v Goossens Meubelen BV (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Industrial and commercial property — Copyright and related rights — Directive 93/98/EEC — Article 10(2) — Term of protection — No revival of protection due to Berne Convention)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62015CA0169
62015CA0169
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
19.12.2016
Official Journal of the European Union
C 475/6
(Case C-169/15) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Industrial and commercial property - Copyright and related rights - Directive 93/98/EEC - Article 10(2) - Term of protection - No revival of protection due to Berne Convention))
(2016/C 475/07)
Language of the case: Dutch
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Montis Design BV
Defendant: Goossens Meubelen BV
Operative part of the judgment
Article 10(2) of Council Directive 93/98/EEC of 29 October 1993 harmonising the term of protection of copyright and certain related rights, read together with Article 13(1) of that directive, must be interpreted as meaning that the terms of protection laid down by that directive do not apply to copyright which was initially protected by national legislation but which was extinguished prior to 1 July 1995.
Directive 93/98 must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation which, initially, had granted, as in the main proceedings, copyright protection to a work, but which, subsequently, caused that copyright to be definitively extinguished, before 1 July 1995, by reason of non-compliance with a formal requirement.
(<span class="note">1</span>) OJ C 228, 13.7.2015.