EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-458/22 P: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 16 November 2023 — Robert Roos, Anne-Sophie Pelletier, Francesca Donato, Virginie Joron, Robert Jan Rooken, Christine Anderson, Annika Bruna, Silvia Limmer, Joachim Kuhs, Marcellinus Jacobus Richardus Laurentius De Graaf, Mathilde Androuet, Bernhard Zimniok, Nicolaus Fest v European Parliament, IC, Rosa D’Amato, Claude Gruffat, Damien Carême, Benoît Biteau (Appeal — Public health — Access to the buildings of the European Parliament — Obligation to present a valid EU digital COVID-19 certificate — Decision of the Bureau of the European Parliament — Rules of Procedure of the Parliament — Article 25 — Concept of ‘power to determine its internal organisation’ — Article 8(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Protection of personal data — Concept of a measure ‘laid down by law’ — Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 — Articles 5 and 6 — Concept of ‘Union law’ — Inclusion of the internal rules of a Union institution or body)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022CA0458

62022CA0458

November 16, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

Series C

C/2024/523

(Case C-458/22 P) (1)

(Appeal - Public health - Access to the buildings of the European Parliament - Obligation to present a valid EU digital COVID-19 certificate - Decision of the Bureau of the European Parliament - Rules of Procedure of the Parliament - Article 25 - Concept of ‘power to determine its internal organisation’ - Article 8(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Protection of personal data - Concept of a measure ‘laid down by law’ - Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 - Articles 5 and 6 - Concept of ‘Union law’ - Inclusion of the internal rules of a Union institution or body)

(C/2024/523)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellants: Robert Roos, Anne-Sophie Pelletier, Francesca Donato, Virginie Joron, Robert Jan Rooken, Christine Anderson, Annika Bruna, Silvia Limmer, Joachim Kuhs, Marcellinus Jacobus Richardus Laurentius De Graaf, Mathilde Androuet, Bernhard Zimniok, Nicolaus Fest (represented by: P. de Bandt, R. Gherghinaru, and V. Heinen, avocats)

Other parties to the proceedings: IC, Rosa D’Amato, Claude Gruffat, Damien Carême, Benoît Biteau; European Parliament (represented by: S. Alves, A.-M. Dumbrăvan, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Dismisses the appeal;

2.Orders Mr Robert Roos and the other appellants to pay the costs.

(1)

OJ C 340, 5.9.2022.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/523/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

* * *

Language of the case: French.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia